Which of the following options can contribute to successful prosecution of hate crimes?

The choice that contributes to successful prosecution of hate crimes is the implementation of standardized procedures to prosecute hate crime cases. Standardized procedures establish clear guidelines and protocols that law enforcement and prosecutors can follow when handling hate crime incidents. This consistency ensures that these crimes are treated with the seriousness they deserve and can help to gather the necessary evidence effectively.

Standardized procedures also facilitate training for law enforcement on recognizing and documenting hate crimes appropriately, which is essential for building a comprehensive case. By ensuring everyone involved in the prosecution process understands the specific nature of hate crimes and the requirements for proving them, these procedures can help to ensure that cases are pursued efficiently and fairly, leading to more successful outcomes in the courtroom.

In contrast, while special defenses and lenient sentences might impact the successful prosecution of various crimes, they don't directly enforce the accountability and rigor necessary for prosecuting hate crimes. Impartial juries are important for any trial, but without the foundation of standardized procedures specifically for hate crimes, the chances of fair and just outcomes can diminish. Therefore, standardized procedures play a crucial role in ensuring that hate crimes are prosecuted effectively.